2024 Cit vs. godavari saraf

Cit vs. godavari saraf

Author: fbqk

August undefined, 2024

WebJul 4, 2016 · Such a High Court being a non-jurisdictional High Court does not alter the position as laid down by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the matter of CIT vs. Godavari Devi Saraf ([1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom)] and as analysed by a coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of ACIT Vs Aurangabad Holiday Resorts Pvt Ltd [(2009) 118 ITD 1 (Pune)]. WebJun 24, 2016 · Such a High Court being a non-jurisdictional High Court does not alter the position as laid down by Honble Bombay High Court in the matter of CIT vs. Godavari Devi Saraf ([1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom)] and as analysed by a coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of ACIT Vs Aurangabad Holiday Resorts Pvt Ltd [(2009) 118 ITD 1 (Pune)]. 10.

FIRST BIG LEAP - Held That >>> Decision of any High Court.

WebApr 8, 2024 · (This judgement can be used and is applicable across the country. Decision of any High Court is binding on all subordinate authorities and Tribunals through out India untill contrary view is taken by respective parent HC – CIT vs. Godavari Saraf, Bom HC) WebFurther, the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Godavari Saraf reported in [1978] 113 ITR 589 (Bom.) has held that if there is no … farmhouse roman shades for windows

Binding value of hc judgement - Judgments

WebSep 11, 2024 · CIT Vs. Godavari Devi Saraf (1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom) In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in disallowing exemption u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) with respect to renovation expenses. ... On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the order of the AO by holding that any investment made … WebMar 7, 2024 · In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent … WebCIT vs. The KCP Limited (Andhra Pradesh High Court) S. 37 (1)/145 (2): Entire law on accrual of liability under mercantile system of accounting explained in the context of Accounting Standard 4 (AS-4) (contingencies and events occurring after the balance sheet date) issued by the ICAI and s. 211 of the Companies Act, 1956, after referring to ... free printable easter paper

Viacom 18 Media Private Limited, ... vs Dcit (It)-4(3)(1), Mumbai …

Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... vs Shravan Mahipat Hedau …

WebSep 21, 2010 · ...CIT v. Smt. Godavaridevi Saraf [1978] 113 ITR 589, for the proposition that the Tribunal should take notice of the aforesaid decisions...prescription of the time … WebCIT had no jurisdiction as there was no order under s. 127 as the order was quashed by the High Court passed under s. 127 and for this he relied upon the decision of the Bombay … farm house rollsWebApr 8, 2024 · (This judgement can be used and is applicable across the country. Decision of any High Court is binding on all subordinate authorities and Tribunals through out India … farmhouse roman shades

"WebSuch a High Court being a non-jurisdictional High Court does not alter the position as laid down by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the matter of CIT vs. Godavari Devi Saraf ([1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom)] and as analysed by a coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of ACIT Vs Aurangabad Holiday Resorts Pvt Ltd [(2009) 118 ITD 1 (Pune)]." " - Cit vs. godavari saraf

Cit vs. godavari saraf

V Green Furnitures And Fixtures, ... vs Ito- Ward7(2), Hyderabad …

WebAug 3, 2016 · (A) CIT Vs Godavari Power & Ispat Ltd (223 Taxman 234) (Chattisgarh HC) "30. The Steel-Division of the Assessee is a consumer. The CPP of...consideration before Chhattisgarh High Court in case of CIT v. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd. [2014] 42 taxmann.com 551/223 Taxman 234, in which the Court held and observed as under...

Did you know?

WebSep 11, 2009 · CIT(A) dismissed, the appeal of assessee by holding that full and true disclosure of all material facts was not done by the assessee during the original assessment proceedings he held the re-assessment proceedings to be valid. Coming to the first argument of the assessee we find that the notice for reopening the assessment u/s 147 … WebAug 25, 2024 · "Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding …

http://www.in.kpmg.com/taxflashnews/KPMG-Flash-News-R-K-P-Company-2.pdf WebThe assessee also relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case CIT vs Smt Godavari Saraf reported in [1978] 113 !TR 539 (Bom) wherein it was held that when section 140A(3) has already been declared ultra vires by competent High Court in country, authority like Tribunal acting anywhere in country has to respect law laid ...

WebMar 8, 2012 · In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to proceed on the footing that the law declared by the High Court, though of another State, is the fina... WebFebruary 2015, passed by the learned CIT(A) in the matter of assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for the …

WebThe CIT(A) ought not to have confirmed the same considering the fact that the contributions for the months April to May, 2024 were paid with marginal delay and contributions for Dec. 2024 to Feb.2024 were paid before the financial year ended on 31.3.2024 and contribution for March, 2024 was paid before the due date of filing of IT return u/s ...

WebSep 30, 2024 · The Bombay High Court has, in CIT Vidarbha vs. Godavari Devi Saraf, held that law laid down by the High Court, even in it is of a different state, ought to be respected. 20. In CCE vs. Valson Dyeing Bleaching and Printing Works [2010 (259) ELT 33 (Bom.)] the Bombay High Court had upheld the Tribunal decision wherein Tribunal had followed a ... farmhouse roofWebBy his order dated October 22, 1973, passed under section 140A(3), the Income-tax Officer levied a penalty of Rs. 800. 3. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Income-tax Officer, … farmhouse roof colorsWebAug 25, 2024 · Nitin (Querist) 25 August 2024 This query is : Resolved Dear Sir, Please share with me the order judgement "Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf" "Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding … free printable easter picture quizWebAug 2, 2016 · In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to proceed on the footing that the law declared by the High Court, though of another State, is the fina... farmhouse roman shade ideasWebIt has been held in following cases that the Tribunal is obliged to follow the decision of any High Court of other State where there is no contrary decision on that matter by any other High Court - (i) CIT vs. Smt Nirmala Bai K. Dareckar, 186 ITR 242 (Bom), (ii) CIT vs Smt. Godavari Saraf, 113 ITR 589 (Bom). In CIT vs. Maganlal Mohal Lal (HUF ... free printable easter sermonsWebHeld That >>> Decision of any High Court binding on all subordinate authorities and Tribunals through out India, untill contrary view is taken by other HC... Case Law >>> … farm house roofingWebCIT vs. Mangalal Mohanlal Panchal (HUF) 210 ITR 580 (Guj) CIT vs. Smt. Godavari Saraf 113 ITR 589 ... In the case of Mayavati vs. CIT the Hon'ble Delhi 44 ITA No.93/Ahd/2007 Asst. Year 1998-99 High Court the judgment in the case of Haryana Acrilyc Manufacturing Co. (supra) was explained as under :- "Mr. Salve learned senior counsel ... free printable easter playdough mats